The catapult model of pole vault is technically complex. It has phases to sequence, timing to perfect, positions to hit. An athlete who mastered it became a technician — someone who had refined every element of their interaction with the pole into a precise, practiced routine.
That mastery came at a cost.
The trap of technical complexity
In the catapult model, every phase depends on the one before it. The bend must be loaded correctly for the recoil to work. The recoil must be timed correctly for the ride to work. The ride must be timed correctly for the bar clearance to work. Every element is connected — not as a continuous flow of energy, but as a chain of sequential dependencies, each one a potential point of failure.
The result was that athletes had to control their speed. More speed disrupted the timing. A faster approach broke what had been carefully built. The technique constrained the athlete rather than serving them. The most technically refined vaulters in the catapult model hit a ceiling they could not break through — because breaking through it required dismantling the very thing they had spent years perfecting.
Positions. Control.
More speed breaks the timing. More energy disrupts the sequence. Technical perfection becomes a ceiling. The athlete serves the technique.
No timing. No phases.
More speed produces more height. More energy produces more height. There is nothing to break. The technique serves the athlete.
One movement — like the rigid pole
The m640 model returns to the clarity of the rigid pole era. There are no phases to sequence, no timing to perfect, no positions to hit. The vault is one continuous movement from takeoff to release — exactly as it was on a rigid pole, where nobody spoke of timing the recoil because there was no recoil to time.
The athlete's instruction is simple: generate maximum energy continuously from the moment your feet leave the ground to the moment you release the pole. That is the complete technical model. Everything else — the bend of the pole, the inversion of the body, the clearance of the bar — follows as a consequence.
This is why rockback was replaced with inversion, and why pullthrough replaced the catapult ride. Rockback is a position to hit — a moment to time, a phase to execute. Inversion is a description of continuous movement. The language reflects the model: not what to stop and do, but what is happening as the athlete drives the system.
The positive feedback loop
Because the m640 model has no timing constraints and no sequential dependencies, it does something the catapult model cannot: it creates a direct connection between physical development and performance.
In the catapult model, more speed breaks the technique. In the m640 model, more speed is the technique. There is no ceiling imposed by the method itself — only the ceiling imposed by the athlete's physical development.
This is what Vitaly Petrov described as the most remarkable discovery — not the technique itself, but that the simplified method amplified physical growth. The feedback loop is the engine. Simplicity is what makes it possible.
The m640 model is simple enough to introduce to a beginner on their first day. It is deep enough that the world's best vaulters have not exhausted it. That is not a contradiction — it is the point. Simple principles, applied with maximum physical input, produce results that complex techniques cannot reach.
How to apply this model — to your vault, your athletes, your program — is inside the membership.
Become a Member