Height in pole vault depends on one thing: the energy an athlete generates. Not the pole. Not the grip height. Not the technique as a sequence of positions to hit. The athlete's energy input — from the first step of the approach to the moment the pole is released. The bar height you clear is its direct result.
From the moment the feet leave the ground to the release of the pole, time on pole lasts under 1.45 seconds. For elite vaulters, closer to 1.10 seconds. That is the total window. Every fraction of a second spent not adding energy to the system is a fraction of a second that cannot be recovered. There is no time to waste.
The rigid pole makes this obvious
Imagine you are jumping on a rigid pole — the way vaulters competed before fiberglass existed. Above your grip is a bar you need to clear. What do you do?
You work continuously and immediately. There is no pole bend to load, no recoil to wait for, no catapult to catch. Your body must rise entirely through your own effort, and it must rise from the moment your feet leave the ground. Any pause, any stopping of the upward motion, makes the attempt worse. On a rigid pole this is self-evident — stopping and restarting is nearly impossible and clearly counterproductive.
The best rigid pole vaulters achieved a "push" — the difference between grip height and bar height — of 1.06 to 1.10 meters. Very few flexible pole vaulters today match this.
What changed with the flexible pole
When fiberglass poles arrived, a new idea took hold: bend the pole, then ride the recoil. The pole bends, stores energy, releases it, and the athlete catches the upward momentum. This thinking introduced something that would have been unthinkable on a rigid pole — passive phases. Moments where the athlete stops contributing and waits. Waits for the pole to load. Waits for the recoil.
On a rigid pole, a passive phase is obviously destructive. On a flexible pole, it became normalized. Even coached.
The m640 model rejects this entirely.
Any moment where the athlete is adding energy to the system. Energy accumulates. The bar height you clear is its direct result. These are the only moments that matter.
Any moment where the athlete stops contributing — waiting for the pole to load, waiting for the recoil. The clock is still running. The window is still shrinking. Nothing is being added.
The goal of the m640 model is continuous active phases from takeoff to release. No waiting. No stops and restarts. A continuous chain of energy input where the athlete is contributing every moment the physics of the event allow.
Who vaults this way
What Bubka and Petrov created served as the foundation of the m640 model. Thirty-five world records over fifteen years were not the product of superior athleticism alone — they were the product of a fundamentally different energy framework, one that Vitaly Petrov developed and Sergey Bubka executed at a level the sport has never seen before or since.
Today's best vaulters confirm it. Among men, Renaud Lavillenie, Armand Duplantis, and Emmanouil Karalis all vault within the m640 framework at the highest level. The world record and the current elite results are not accidents. Performance consistently above 6.10m cannot be achieved if passive phases are significantly present — the physics simply do not allow it.
The same holds for the women's event. Elena Isinbaeva, Stacy Dragila, Katie Moon, and Nina Kennedy — four athletes who between them hold Olympic titles, world records, and championship medals across three decades — all vault within the m640 model. The framework does not discriminate by gender. The physics are the same.
Detailed analysis of each athlete — where the model holds perfectly and where improvement is possible — is inside the membership.
The full model — how to achieve continuous active phases through every element of the vault — is inside.
Become a Member